Yes, I was well aware that Chris Haulmark is a Democrat at first; which was a big joke. Why did I write that Chris is a Republican in the first place? Because, his way of thinking and values are exactly what the Republicans are today. There is no way that Chris has blue blood in his veins.
I grew up in a Blue blood family and can see a Democrat when I see one. Chris is not even that close. He would dehumanize Deaf people by proclaiming them unworthy of the least consideration as human beings. This is precisely how Trump got Republicans to accept the corruption and bullying. Once Chris have “successfully” enshrined the idea of a class of Deaf people justly denied any rights, then Chris set the bar who fits that class. In fact, Chris registered his home address in Arkansas, not Kansas—by possibly using someone else’s fixed address in Kansas. Is it even legal?
Once running for U.S. Congress seat, it is not even funny business that everything has to be valid and trustworthy in order. I mean, I am talking about United States Congress seat! His press releases and goals—not an inch to talk about criminal justice reform as Democrats are strongly encouraged about it. See the difference?
Plus, Chris does not have any political experience even in American Deaf community. None! The only experience he has is from Alexander Graham Bell freaks. It was quite a comedy show what Chris was putting on and made a fool out of himself. Bullying and pathological lies are rapidly becoming a thing of the past. Once the alien is created, it is all but impossible to control it.
Knowing this is the worst part. Awareness of one’s lack of freedom does not make one any less confined, just as the awareness of one’s drowning does not make one any less of a drowning person, it only adds the burden of panic. I do believe in second chances for Deaf returned citizens to rebuild their life and change their ways.
Although what Chris did by “destroying” my reputation as an invited speaker for Deaf Protest, it was a long term damage and Chris wreak on Deaf people, especially when they were vulnerable, is too heinous and his callous narcissistic attitude toward Deaf returned citizens and society is too dangerous. Haulmark offers a glimpse of an answer here: It is OK to preach hate against certain of Deaf people he thinks he knows everything. We need to keep up patterns of his irrational thoughts and behavior that have questioned for most of its existence.
I have seen how Chris’s attitude towards Deaf people with full of hate. He is not even qualified to run in United States Congress. Not even as a Democrat at this matter, too. Haulmark’s agenda and goals were a total joke, which indicates both a streak of lack of idealism and practical politician’s value of compromise. He enjoyed his vacation in Mexico and had to escape from America for time being as the “snitch” on the ‘program’ and he chose to do that—figure that out, will you?
After all, Chris Haulmark’s speech will live in infamy. Chris is throwing gasoline on a dying controversy for motivated political gain to help Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing in fame. This man is not qualified for a political seat at all.
Copyright © 2017 Jason Tozier
This text may be freely copied in its entirely only, including this copyright message.
There was a quote by a Black student at a historically white university, “Everything, everywhere I look, everywhere I turn, right, left, is white. It’s lily white, it’s painted with white. And it’s funny, because I was reading this article about how America is synonymous with white people. I mean, I’m sure when Europeans, or Asians or Africans for this matter, think of America, they think of white people, because white people are mainstream, white people are general. “White is right,” as my daddy tells me. White is right, at least they think it is. So, if you’re a black person trying to assert yourself, and express your culture, there’s something wrong with you, because to do that is to be diametrically opposed to everything this country stands for. And everything this country stands for is what is white.”
Is Gallaudet a historically white university? Remember, Gallaudet University is a federally funded university through United States Congress, the founding fathers and its documents stand for democracy, liberty, and justice around the world. The United States Congress: Appropriations Committee gives Gallaudet University around $115 million, maybe little more than that—not enough money for awareness. What are the psychological consequences, if any, of an educational government like Gallaudet University and society discrimination against its Black Deaf students? There is not much information on the character and breadth of the discrimination faced by Black Deaf students on the campus.
There are PLENTY of stories that are not told—and that is where the administration is responsible for covering up lies, and do nothing. Ignorance is indeed bliss, as the administration tends to react more in fear than in education when it comes to Racism; however, the primary concern would be liability. Gallaudet does not want to face litigation and public scrutiny and make sure there is restricted access to Racism. On the one hand, certain strategies such as an community accountability or limiting truth access may be the balanced approach, addressing Racism and largely invalidates the concepts of community accountability, creates fear which gives great scrutiny to the Black Deaf students may hinder the efforts at minimizing Racism at great cost.
In a 1989 ABC News/Washington Post survey 37 percent of black respondents agreed that blacks generally face discrimination in getting a quality education. There is no question that Black Deaf students face discrimination in getting a quality education even in 1989 and now in 2015—no doubt. How does higher education influence Black Deaf students’ social and political distrust at Gallaudet? The administration denies access for the “easy way out” and least likely to cause dissention in the ranks. However, in failing to address Racism to begin with, there are a number of bad consequences, including the reputation of a closed-door policy, a rejection of Racism calling to admonish the racists, and the false sense of security of never addressing Racism, which will last only as long as a white racist is caught in the act.
Ultimately, Gallaudet University must make up its own responsibility as to the course of action to take. In the event Gallaudet wishes to develop a “restricted access” plan that is why the administration could not handle truth. In spite of educational laws banning discrimination, Gallaudet University remains bastions of Racism. In the late 1980s a report of the National Commission on Minority Participation in Education and American Life, One Third of a Nation, found a significant decline in black participation in higher education. (American Council on Education and the Education Commission of the States, One-Third of a Nation, Washington: The American Council on Education, 1988).
Given Black Deaf students’ discrimination experiences in almost every aspect of life, even at Gallaudet University, one might wonder why Black Deaf students would even trust at all.
Again, is Gallaudet a historically white university?
Copyright © 2015 Jason Tozier
This text may be freely copied in its entirely only including this copyright message.
The picture in Library of Congress (LOC)-Thomas Jefferson Building sends a message. Gallaudet covers pretty much what literature is all about. Congress had the fundamental source of “community and continuity” that made Gallaudet the most powerful society. It reminds me of a quote, “We Americans like to think of our revolution as not being radical; indeed, most of the time we consider it downright conservative”–Gordon S. Wood. I’ve taken few good friends to visit LOC and see the message and let them think. I love doing that!
This room is dedicated to those who cannot help (procure) themselves. I often wonder if it is part of learning refutes old ways of thinking. It also cancels all wrong concepts. Is there a reason Gallaudet scripted in same room as the quote scripted? That is how Congress educates itself into viewing the Deaf. We cannot procure our own instruction ourselves. See the picture below. Gallaudet represent the body of knowledge. Let’s look at the sign of GALLAUDET to imply an ongoing power struggle for the Deaf. Gallaudet is appropriated by Congress so it is never Deaf-centered. From Merriam-Webster: Procure appeared into Middle English, from Anglo-French procurer, from Late Latin procurare, from Latin, to take care of, from pro- for + cura care. “To Take Care Of”—is kind of insulting for Deaf people.
Humiliation will always present. It is how you handle it makes all the difference. As far as I could remember, Gallaudet University is federally funded, private university. It is a privilege, not a right. This is what the administration loves to assert: you rock the ship, and they’d best had you removed. There are hidden volumes in the library, for example, Gallaudet Archives protect the most important term on the seal. Why not? There is a vacuum in the university leadership to raise or find funds for them as long as the religious leaders are happy to see the term running on the seal today. Speaking of appropriation (budget), Gallaudet University belongs with Congress, not the Deaf. Thus, it is a privilege for the Deaf, never the right of the Deaf.
The “those who cannot procure it for themselves” statement you see the photo above from Library of Congress begs for a greater development, a head-on challenge. In the other word, we can branch out our intellectual life by setting up Deaf-centered, Deaf-controlled, and Deaf-oriented University so it becomes necessarily that Deaf people can continue to make new meanings. What is the truth? In the case of “waving our language”, the truth is what we need to be proactive about our condition, namely, DEAF.
The word, “DEAF” belongs to us Deaf people in the same manner that the word “THINK” belongs to IBM, and the phrase “Just Do It” belongs to Nike. I do not understand why GALLAUDET was scripted in the same room, “those who cannot procure it for themselves“. Is it an evocative of oppression the Deaf community could easily and readily identify? Perhaps it could not evolve in the university mission for the matter because of its hidden agenda that defines Gallaudet of so called “new order of Deaf people”–and it is Orwellian utopia where the Big People are watching, isn’t EPHPHATHA part of those who cannot procure it for themselves to hear? (The funny thing is that LOC is one of my favorite places to hang out and study).
Copyright © Jason Tozier
This text may be freely copied in its entirely only, including this copyright message.